I have been accused of hating love and not understanding other people’s notions of love. Perhaps it is indeed true that I do not understand other people’s notions of this profoundly perplexing human emotion and their expectations of it. However, I am certain that I do not ‘hate’ love. How can I, when I fall in love with so many things around me almost a hundred times each day?
When I watch the sky at different points of the day, I feel gladdened to see it in all its unwavering beauty. There is always some aspect that draws my soul towards it and makes me love gazing at it for endless hours, staring intently at the ephemeral clouds, the graceful birds and the innumerable shades of colour that I see. Aye, I do call it love, for it is what I feel: boundless joy at being one with the world around me, just like the boundless sky.
I love music. I love art. I love good literature. I love the fact that the human mind is equipped with creative energies capable of giving rise to such monuments, such tributes to intelligence and thought, such testaments to the freedom of creating such ethereal forms of self-expression. It gives me so much joy that I feel inspired, motivated and driven to do the same and live up to myself and all that I am capable of.
I could go on endlessly about all the little things that I fall in love with everyday. Yes, the feeling is love, for I feel happiness, hope, despair, fear, grief, anguish, ecstasy and pain all at the same time. It is intense enough to overwhelm me and leave me gasping for breath, yet I enjoy every moment of it, even the pain of feeling stifled or choked by its power … and its beauty.
However, I may be asked why I have left human interactions out of this proclamation of mine. Why have I not mentioned any people? What are my views on ‘relationships’ between people? In a word: ‘confusing’. For instance, I find people speaking of certain ‘standards’ that they have, standards that they have set for themselves with no pressure from other people, however these standards are hardly, if ever maintained. You say that you believe in something, but your actions state otherwise. You say that you have set certain ethical boundaries for yourself, yet you do not hesitate to cross them the moment you find them uncomfortable, testing or difficult to live by. You say that you love, but you don’t truly mean it. For you it is just another word … a bit of ‘fun’, nothing more. I do not understand this at all.
Without wishing to sound judgemental, I must mention that I find behaviour of this kind incomprehensible since it is something that I personally would not do. Although I have learnt that it is unrealistic to assume that people are truly what they present themselves to be, I find this deception bewildering. What is wrong or quite so difficult about being truthful about yourself? Why would you say something if you didn’t actually mean it? What kind of satisfaction does one get from lying when it is certain that the façade put up by lies is sure to crumble one day? I find no rational answers to these questions of mine.
Considering a different angle, this entire concept of ‘declaring’ how much you love a person to the whole world, indulging in what I often call ‘mushy-ness’, going to great lengths to show other people how much you care by stating that you would die for a person, is something that I find odd and also somewhat illogical. I find it odd since I don’t understand why one would want to let oneself be quite so vulnerable to the world at large, leaving one at the mercy of a world that is simply waiting to steal something away. I am a very private person and I find it unfathomable why someone would want everyone to know of something quite so personal and make such public displays of ‘sappy’ behaviour. The logical part of me asks how one can know for certain that the relationship will actually last long enough to be boasted about to all and sundry. I have seen people constantly talk about their love-lives only to have their relationships end after a week or a month.
I have nothing against love itself neither do I judge people who are in love by categorising them as ‘bad’, ‘wrong’ or some other adjective. It must be nice to be able to open up to that extent to someone else. It’s just that I am sceptical about it as people often don’t mean what they say (and are sometimes unaware of the fact that they don’t). Life isn’t all about fairy-tale endings, neither is it a replication of a clichéd romantic comedy. Speaking from a practical point of view, I must say that looking at life through rose-tinted glasses will only result in one’s vision being flawed. While I understand that it is only human instinct acting when people feel ‘attracted’ to each other, I think that it would be foolish and illogical to assume that any sort of relationship can be based on lust alone.
At the risk of sounding didactic, I’ll venture this: at the end of the road it is all about companionship. Lust and attraction do indeed fade after some time just like the hormone levels of humans tend to fluctuate. However if you’re comfortable in the presence of the person whom you profess to love, and find his or her company soothing and calming even in times of distress, then, I feel that it’s a relationship that has the potential to last, provided that both parties involved are willing to work at maintaining it. Call me foolish and idealistic, but I think that love should be long-term if it is to be worth all the effort. In the end it’s about being with a person whom you can sit next to or lie with ‘and just forget the world’.
When I watch the sky at different points of the day, I feel gladdened to see it in all its unwavering beauty. There is always some aspect that draws my soul towards it and makes me love gazing at it for endless hours, staring intently at the ephemeral clouds, the graceful birds and the innumerable shades of colour that I see. Aye, I do call it love, for it is what I feel: boundless joy at being one with the world around me, just like the boundless sky.
I love music. I love art. I love good literature. I love the fact that the human mind is equipped with creative energies capable of giving rise to such monuments, such tributes to intelligence and thought, such testaments to the freedom of creating such ethereal forms of self-expression. It gives me so much joy that I feel inspired, motivated and driven to do the same and live up to myself and all that I am capable of.
I could go on endlessly about all the little things that I fall in love with everyday. Yes, the feeling is love, for I feel happiness, hope, despair, fear, grief, anguish, ecstasy and pain all at the same time. It is intense enough to overwhelm me and leave me gasping for breath, yet I enjoy every moment of it, even the pain of feeling stifled or choked by its power … and its beauty.
However, I may be asked why I have left human interactions out of this proclamation of mine. Why have I not mentioned any people? What are my views on ‘relationships’ between people? In a word: ‘confusing’. For instance, I find people speaking of certain ‘standards’ that they have, standards that they have set for themselves with no pressure from other people, however these standards are hardly, if ever maintained. You say that you believe in something, but your actions state otherwise. You say that you have set certain ethical boundaries for yourself, yet you do not hesitate to cross them the moment you find them uncomfortable, testing or difficult to live by. You say that you love, but you don’t truly mean it. For you it is just another word … a bit of ‘fun’, nothing more. I do not understand this at all.
Without wishing to sound judgemental, I must mention that I find behaviour of this kind incomprehensible since it is something that I personally would not do. Although I have learnt that it is unrealistic to assume that people are truly what they present themselves to be, I find this deception bewildering. What is wrong or quite so difficult about being truthful about yourself? Why would you say something if you didn’t actually mean it? What kind of satisfaction does one get from lying when it is certain that the façade put up by lies is sure to crumble one day? I find no rational answers to these questions of mine.
Considering a different angle, this entire concept of ‘declaring’ how much you love a person to the whole world, indulging in what I often call ‘mushy-ness’, going to great lengths to show other people how much you care by stating that you would die for a person, is something that I find odd and also somewhat illogical. I find it odd since I don’t understand why one would want to let oneself be quite so vulnerable to the world at large, leaving one at the mercy of a world that is simply waiting to steal something away. I am a very private person and I find it unfathomable why someone would want everyone to know of something quite so personal and make such public displays of ‘sappy’ behaviour. The logical part of me asks how one can know for certain that the relationship will actually last long enough to be boasted about to all and sundry. I have seen people constantly talk about their love-lives only to have their relationships end after a week or a month.
I have nothing against love itself neither do I judge people who are in love by categorising them as ‘bad’, ‘wrong’ or some other adjective. It must be nice to be able to open up to that extent to someone else. It’s just that I am sceptical about it as people often don’t mean what they say (and are sometimes unaware of the fact that they don’t). Life isn’t all about fairy-tale endings, neither is it a replication of a clichéd romantic comedy. Speaking from a practical point of view, I must say that looking at life through rose-tinted glasses will only result in one’s vision being flawed. While I understand that it is only human instinct acting when people feel ‘attracted’ to each other, I think that it would be foolish and illogical to assume that any sort of relationship can be based on lust alone.
At the risk of sounding didactic, I’ll venture this: at the end of the road it is all about companionship. Lust and attraction do indeed fade after some time just like the hormone levels of humans tend to fluctuate. However if you’re comfortable in the presence of the person whom you profess to love, and find his or her company soothing and calming even in times of distress, then, I feel that it’s a relationship that has the potential to last, provided that both parties involved are willing to work at maintaining it. Call me foolish and idealistic, but I think that love should be long-term if it is to be worth all the effort. In the end it’s about being with a person whom you can sit next to or lie with ‘and just forget the world’.
16 comments:
This is just what love is, in terms of companionship. A person whom you can open up to, pour your heart out, listen to their problems and try your level best to solve them. That's love.
What relationships are based on is usually lust, and at times competitiveness. I have come across people, who want a partner just for the heck of it. It is not lust, no. It is the fact that their friends have a partner and they do not want to "stay behind" in the race.
What you say is the truth and it is bitter for many. You might come under fire from people, but this is a common practice against the true.
Know this, though, I think the same way. And this was an amazing read.
Some people term lust as love. Where as others term love as lust. And there are people in the world (especially from virtual world of Bollywood) who claim that only love (in terms of companionship) can complete the full circle of life. In my opinion its nothing but kitsch. Agree human beings like to love and to be loved. But there should not be any pretentious display of it. And I'm of the strong opinion that Love lacks pragmatism. In world full of love we wont find squabbles. In world of full love we wont find words like jealousy. Companionship provides us with much bigger picture. And love is little part of that picture. Afterall to be a good companion you are not required to be a good lover. Thats why good friends are hard to find.
But I loved your post. :). You have facsimiled my thoughts in this post. If anyone asks me what is my idea of love, I will redirect to this post.
You couldn't have been more correct.
That's all I can say as of now.
I 'loved' this post. It's time the world was shown how over-the-top it goes when it comes to expressing love.
yup i agree...
love is a feeling that can just be felt and not expressed,but this was the closest it can get!
People connect on various levels,all detached and isolated from each other in their own right,but juxtapose somehow to give rise to the...feeling. Physical attraction,lust are natural human instincts,reactions that cannot be ignored and which ultimately surmounts to the 'higher' feeling,that of love(of,desire,of need for a companion) I have trouble accepting the fact that love can be forced,because then the term becomes irrelevant. The lack of profundity,depth,and the realization of love in its true essence is what you're hinting at? You can't possibly expect people to be introspective and rational enough to understand that. But the feeling,however superficial it might be,is still there.
Love doesn't have to be permanent.It rarely is,actually.
And I can't add anything to this, can I. You've followed my lead Shark!!
___
yjiqpgxq
Word verification.
what a post!!!!!
just BRILLIANT!!!!! this is just stamp mark LD... love between 2 human beings has been polluted by people falling love all over the place...people say relations can be such a blessing, well so can separations...
aye aye - at the end of the day it is more about how comfortable you are after the initial fire is out.
"its not rainbows and butterflies but compromise that moves us along" - Maroon 5
I agree with this partially - I think love should make you more integrated and creative and though rainbows and butterflies don't move us along, if forced to compromise love dies right at that instant.
Human nature has many more complex nuances than is possible to cover in one blog post - there are more love relationships than just romance based.
Many well meaning people truly in love with each other and not just the image of it, can also fall apart at one time or another. It is possible, and not irrational.
And although I do appreciate this post very much, I would like you to broaden your vision a little, about the issue.
Immediately condemning two people in a relationship is something I'm sure you would not do, since only the two in the relationship would be able to tell you what makes it work, no outside individual can ever point that out.
And these people who hook up for a week or month should not be held up as examples of romantic love - they aren't.
As for lust, from my limited perception/observation I can tell you that a physical relationship is beautiful and intimate only if you're truly in love, and able to appreciate the spiritual value of it - thus saving yourself for the right age and the right person is very important.
To this end I would like to defend those who have had their names blackened by these random plastic individuals.
No, what you talked about, between those people is not love, not even a sorry imitation of it.
"The greatest thing you will ever learn, is how to love and be loved in return"
- a naive romantic
Some very wise words on love here! Thank you. And you seem to have a joy of life that I envy you. Don't let anyone rob you of it.
You don't have it right, do you?
You have essentially described "relationships" as known to the overwhelming majority of people.
Not love.
True love has no standards. No expectations. No codes of behaviour. You know that already, from your love of the sky, of music, of art. You said yourself that you consider it as special as 'human love'. Then why set standards for love between people alone?
You rant about stupid standards (mind you, I agree with that, but enough people have already told youu so), but then you end up setting your own expectations of it.
Why must love be 'committed'? Why should it last long? And who says love has no lust, no attraction? When you love someone, it is natural to express yourself through your body, express the things you can find no words for.
In the end, love is about freedom. It takes away your insecurity and sets you free to fly. And yes, it is companionship.
It really doesn't matter how lovers behave to the world. It only matters how they behave with each other. And trust me, there are no expectations for that.
every story has a happy ending.. if its nt happy its nt the end
Coming late onto the scene . . .
Every object is different from a different perspective. Say, if instead of you there was some la-di-da girl head=-over-heels and loving every oment of it, what would've come out would be passionate declarations of eternal love. Whew!
But then, after a few break-ups this world in general seems to weather us into cynical b******s. Love's what we make of it. Whether for the abstract vor the human and intimate. Personally, I can spend hours adoring an evening sky. But then again, if I had never been head-over-heels, that'd be a part of Life's rigmarole I'd be missing in on.
It's only after being stupid, that we realise that w've been stupid. Or in love.
The world is a maskerade, and the darkness in our showy actions is too lucid.
Happy Pujas!
And I concur with everyone who's politely disagreed with this post.
Though you do echo my thoughts when you verbally bash the stereotypical "relationship".
@ SO
freedom does not mean the destruction of standards.
if there are no standards you set, then you can be in love with things or people unworthy of that worship and devotion that you attribute to them.
of course love has to have standards, to be honest and truly free.
General Comment:
All comments to this post, whether they were in agreement or not have been appreciated. Seriously. I like it when people offer their honest opinions and like it even more when I get to read long "postments". Although, I must say that I'm surprised that there were quite so many comments. Heh. Guess everyone has something to say on love.
And now for theindividual replies ...
Xtronus:
Ah you mentioned peer pressure. Yes. That's one major reason why so many people feel the need to jump into 'relationships'.
Thanks for the postment.
Alphabets:
Aye. Good friends are indeed hard to find. Very hard in fact. Wouldn't you rather have one very good friend than many sycophants surrounding you? But life isn't that simple, is it?
Thanks for the postment.
Jadis:
Thank you. Over-the-top was the word, yes.
BDC:
Thanks for the comment. :)
Sayan:
Oh I don't expect people to be rational all the time. It's just that I tend to be rational on most occasions, so I find it difficult to understand irrational behaviour. I like being able to understand how things (and people's minds) work, you see.
And I said that it "should" be permanent if it's to be worth it. I never said that it is.
Thanks for the postment.
Kaz:
I shall not take off word verifications. Ha ha ha.
You could've postmented though. :P
Dream Baron:
Thanks for the comment. :)
Dark Chocolate:
I loved the postment. Thanks.
Aye, human nature cannot be written of in one blog-post. It's way too complicated for that. And I know that what I've written is my still-quite-immature point of view. I have much to see of life and I know that there is a possibility that I might change my mind later on in life. So yes, I shall keep myself open to new ideas.
That last quote, it was from a song called "Nature Boy", right?
Thanks again.
Piano Poet:
Thank you. :)
Oh and "joy of life"? Heh. I have 'improved' much if that's the impression I give out. It's very encouraging to hear what you've said. Thanks again.
Saturnalia's Offspring:
While I am gladdened that you offered your honest opinion, I have to say that we're on two different tracks here.
There are always standards. Being completely unrestricted is also one, is it not? And I agree with what Dark Chocolate has said. Freedom is abused if it has you compromise on your ethical standards. There is always some bit of restraint. Always. And you want your love to be worthy. You wouldn't like it if the person you loved did not value your love. Or would you?
Thanks for the postment though. :)
Abhishek Khanna:
Erm, I'm not speaking of any story here. Just a few general observations. And a couple of clarifications.
Believe me, I'm no embittered soul who's been jilted and is spewing venom out of spite.
Aruni RC:
Another dig at the name, eh? Hmm.
Pratyush:
Of course you can disagree. It's your opinion after all. You're a free person, aren't you? Although it'd have been more interesting had you elaborated.
Thanks for the comment though. :)
Post a Comment